Symmetrical: Yes, works perfectly. I am glad that you raised the model up in the frame (no bulls-eye). She fits the environment and the environment defines the word.
Rhythmic: I don’t get it. Are the leaves supposed to the the rhythmic part? It’s reading as the cliche “natural.”
Asymmetrical: Yep, looks asymmetrical to me. My comment would be that you need to adjust the value structure of the image so that the model gets the highest levels (right now, the car in the window, the mat in front of the door, the reflections, etc., all have the same contrast ratio as the model).
Inanimate: Is this an illustration on the “dead time” of a photo-shoot? This is what I am reading…
Symmetrical: Yes, works perfectly. I am glad that you raised the model up in the frame (no bulls-eye). She fits the environment and the environment defines the word.
Rhythmic: I don’t get it. Are the leaves supposed to the the rhythmic part? It’s reading as the cliche “natural.”
Asymmetrical: Yep, looks asymmetrical to me. My comment would be that you need to adjust the value structure of the image so that the model gets the highest levels (right now, the car in the window, the mat in front of the door, the reflections, etc., all have the same contrast ratio as the model).
Inanimate: Is this an illustration on the “dead time” of a photo-shoot? This is what I am reading…